Communalism, Secularism & Regionalism
1. Communalism: Causes, Phases & Remedies
| Cue Words | Notes |
|---|---|
| Concept & Phases (Bipan Chandra) | Ideology asserting that people belonging to the same religious community have common political, economic, and social interests distinct from or hostile to other religious groups.
|
| Root Causes & Drivers | Historical colonial "Divide and Rule" policies; socio-economic competition for scarce government jobs/resources; political vote-bank polarization; fake news and viral hate speech on social media. NCRB registers 400–500 communal riot cases annually. |
2. Secularism: Indian vs Western Model
| Cue Words | Notes |
|---|---|
| Western Model (Rigid Water-tight Compartment) | Strict mutual exclusion between State and Religion (French Laïcité). State neither supports nor interferes in religious affairs, and religion has no role in public policy. |
| Indian Model (Principled Distance & Sarva Dharma Sambhava) | Equal respect for all religions (Sarva Dharma Sambhava). State maintains "Principled Distance"—allowing state intervention to reform social evils (banning Sati, opening temples to lower castes, abolishing Triple Talaq, enforcing Art 25-28) while giving equal financial and legal support to all religious institutions (e.g., Haj subsidy repeal, temple trust management). |
| S.R. Bommai Case (1994) | Supreme Court bench declared Secularism as part of the Basic Structure of the Constitution. Held that a state government pursuing unsecular politics is liable for dismissal under Article 356. |
3. Regionalism & Sons of the Soil Doctrine
| Cue Words | Notes |
|---|---|
| Types of Regionalism | Strong emotional attachment to a specific geographic region prioritizing regional interests over national interests.
|
| Sons of the Soil Doctrine | Parochial policy claiming that local native inhabitants of a state have exclusive rights over local land, natural resources, and employment to the exclusion of external migrants (e.g., job reservation mandates for locals in Haryana/Jharkhand private sectors, violent anti-migrant drives). Threatens national economic integration and Art 19(1)(d)/(e) mobility. |