The Parliamentary System
📊 High-Yield Data & Statistical Fact Sheet
- Constitutional Ambit: Establishes a parliamentary form of government at the Center (Articles 74 and 75) and in the States (Articles 163 and 164).
- System Definition: The executive (Council of Ministers) is drawn directly from and is collectively accountable to the legislature (specifically the Lok Sabha / lower house).
- Collective Responsibility (Article 75(3)): The bedrock of the parliamentary system. Ministers "swim or sink together". If the Lok Sabha passes a No-Confidence Motion, the entire Council of Ministers (including ministers from the Rajya Sabha) must resign.
- Double Membership & The 6-Month Rule (Article 75(5)):
- A minister must be a member of either House of Parliament.
- If a non-member is appointed minister, they must secure election or nomination to either the Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha within six consecutive months, or they automatically forfeit their office.
- Indian Parliamentary Innovations:
- Zero Hour (1962): An informal Indian innovation not mentioned in the Rules of Procedure, allowing members to raise urgent matters without prior notice.
- Calling Attention Motion (1954): An Indian innovation mentioned in the Rules of Procedure, enabling a member to call the attention of a minister to a matter of urgent public importance.
- Key Divergence (India vs UK):
- No Legal Responsibility: In the UK, every official act of the monarch must be countersigned by a minister who is held legally responsible. In India, there is no system of legal responsibility for ministers; Article 74(2) bars courts from inquiring into advice tendered by ministers to the President.
- Ambedkar's Formula: A presidential system gives more stability but less responsibility; a parliamentary system gives less stability but more responsibility. Responsibility is assessed daily (by the legislature) and periodically (by the electorate).
- Size Caps (91st CAA, 2003): Council of Ministers limited to 15% of the Lok Sabha / State Assembly strength (minimum 12 in states) and 10% in Union Territories with legislatures.
- Binding Advice: The 42nd CAA, 1976 made ministerial advice binding on the President; the 44th CAA, 1978 allowed him to return it for reconsideration once.
- Minister's Oath: Administered only by the President, in the form prescribed by the Third Schedule (Article 75(4)).
- Semi-Presidential Contrast: France runs a dual executive — a directly elected President (foreign policy/defence) alongside a Prime Minister responsible to the legislature (domestic policy).
1. CORE FEATURES OF THE INDIAN WESTMINSTER MODEL
CORE FEATURES OF THE INDIAN WESTMINSTER MODEL
CORE FEATURES OF THE INDIAN WESTMINSTER MODEL
| Cue Words | Notes |
|---|---|
| Analyze key facts and concepts related to CORE FEATURES OF THE INDIAN WESTMINSTER MODEL. |
The parliamentary system in India features a highly coordinated relationship between the executive and legislative branches: |