IASPage

English

हिंदी

English

हिंदी

Appearance

Sources & Features of the Indian Constitution ​

📊 High-Yield Data & Statistical Fact Sheet
  • Administrative Skeleton: Over 60% of the Indian Constitution's structural framework is directly derived from the Government of India (GoI) Act, 1935.
  • Global Custom Synthesis: The remaining 40% represents a highly customized, custom synthesis of global democratic constitutions:
    • British Constitution (15%): Parliamentary system, cabinet rules, legislative processes.
    • US Constitution (10%): Fundamental rights, independent judiciary, judicial review.
    • Other Nations (15%): Ireland (DPSPs), Canada (Strong Union), Australia (Concurrent List), Weimar Germany, South Africa, USSR, France, and Japan.
  • Supremacy Contrast:
    • India: Constitutional Supremacy (laws must align with the written text; checked by strong Judicial Review).
    • United Kingdom: Parliamentary Supremacy (Parliament can make or unmake any law; no court can strike down an Act of Parliament).
  • Numerical Profile: At commencement — Preamble + 395 Articles, 22 Parts, 8 Schedules. Presently — about 470 Articles, 25 Parts, 12 Schedules (Articles are never renumbered; additions carry letters such as 21A, 31A, 243A, 371A).
  • Fundamental Duties: 11 in all — 10 added by the 42nd Amendment (1976) on the Swaran Singh Committee recommendation; the 11th by the 86th Amendment (2002).
  • Franchise: Voting age lowered from 21 to 18 by the 61st Amendment Act, 1988 (Article 326).
  • Local Government: 73rd Amendment, 1992 (Part IX + Eleventh Schedule, Panchayats) and 74th Amendment, 1992 (Part IXA + Twelfth Schedule, Municipalities).

Structural vs Borrowed Features Composition (%)

Loading chart...

1. GLOBAL SOURCES & INSTITUTIONAL BORROWINGS ​

GLOBAL SOURCES & INSTITUTIONAL BORROWINGS ​

GLOBAL SOURCES & INSTITUTIONAL BORROWINGS
Cue WordsNotes
Analyze key facts and concepts related to GLOBAL SOURCES & INSTITUTIONAL BORROWINGS.

  • The framers of the Constitution customized global practices to fit the Indian socio-political landscape rather than blindly copying them:

    | Source Country / Document | Specific Provisions Adopted | Geopolitical Utility / Context |

    | :--- | :--- | :--- |

    | GoI Act 1935 | Federal Scheme, Office of Governor, Public Service Commissions (PSCs), Judiciary structure, and administrative details. | Formed the ready-to-use administrative skeleton of independent India. |

    | United Kingdom (UK) | Parliamentary government, Rule of Law, legislative procedure, Single Citizenship, cabinet system, prerogative writs, and bicameralism. | Leveraged familiar Westminster models, ensuring executive accountability to the legislature. |

    | United States (USA) | Fundamental Rights, independence of the judiciary, Judicial Review, impeachment of the President, removal of SC/HC judges, and the post of Vice-President. | Added a strong judicial check against potential majoritarian executive excess. |

    | Ireland | Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP), nomination of members to Rajya Sabha, and method of electing the President. | Directed the state towards positive socio-economic welfare policies. |

    | Canada | Federation with a strong Center, vesting of residuary powers in the Center, appointment of state governors by the Center, and advisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. | Enforced federal unity to counter secessionist and regional forces post-partition. |

    | Australia | Concurrent List, freedom of trade, commerce and intercourse, and Joint Sitting of the two Houses of Parliament. | Prevented state-level trade barriers and resolved legislative deadlocks. |

    | Weimar Germany | Suspension of Fundamental Rights during Emergency. | Protected national security and sovereignty during extreme crises. |

    | USSR (Russia) | Fundamental Duties (Article 51A) and the ideals of Justice (Social, Economic, Political) in the Preamble. | Emphasized community duties and socialist welfare metrics. |

    | France | Republic status, and the ideals of Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity in the Preamble. | Anchored anti-monarchical, democratic values. |

    | South Africa | Procedure for amendment of the Constitution (Article 368) and election of members of Rajya Sabha. | Established structured methods for constitutional evolution. |

    | Japan | Procedure established by Law (Article 21). | Limited absolute judicial activism relative to US "due process of law". |

2. STRUCTURAL CONTRAST: INDIA VS UNITED KINGDOM ​

STRUCTURAL CONTRAST: INDIA VS UNITED KINGDOM ​

STRUCTURAL CONTRAST: INDIA VS UNITED KINGDOM
Cue WordsNotes
Analyze key facts and concepts related to STRUCTURAL CONTRAST: INDIA VS UNITED KINGDOM.

    While India adopted the Westminster model, the Indian political system deviates from the British model in several fundamental ways:

  • Written vs Unwritten: India has a written, codified, and the world's lengthiest Constitution; the UK operates on an unwritten, uncodified mix of historical statutes and conventions.
  • Constitutional vs Parliamentary Supremacy:
  • India: The Constitution is supreme (Constitutional Supremacy). Laws passed by Parliament are subject to Judicial Review and can be declared ultra vires (void) by the Supreme Court.
  • UK: Parliament is supreme (Parliamentary Supremacy). Courts cannot strike down primary parliamentary legislation.
  • Republic vs Monarchy: India is a Republic with an elected Head of State (President); the UK is a Constitutional Monarchy with a hereditary monarch.
  • Shadow Cabinet: The UK has an institutionalized "Shadow Cabinet" formed by the official opposition to scrutinize departments; India has no such formal institutional counterpart.
  • Speaker’s Office: In the UK, the Speaker formally resigns from their political party upon election to maintain absolute neutrality ("once a Speaker, always a Speaker"); in India, the Speaker remains a member of their political party.

Copyright © 2021-PRESENT ias.schule