Case Studies: The Core of GS4 (120 Marks)
Case studies constitute 50% of the GS4 Mains paper (120 out of 250 marks). This module provides the systematic framework, analytical tools, and writing strategies needed to solve complex administrative dilemmas and write high-scoring answers.
Case Study Overview
| Cue Words | Notes |
|---|---|
| Weightage of Case Studies | - Case studies constitute 50% of the GS4 Mains paper (120 out of 250 marks) |
| Integrated Solution Roadmap | - Step 1: Introduce the Crux (conflict between rules and empathy) - Step 2: Stakeholder & Dilemma Map (Mendelow's Matrix & Value-clash grid) - Step 3: Develop & Evaluate Options (compare alternatives using Deontology & Utility) - Step 4: Formulate Action Plan (Immediate, Intermediate, Long-term steps) - Step 5: Conclude Philosophically (ground in constitutional morality) |
| Core Analytical Frameworks |
|
| Mains Keywords & Quotes |
|
| Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development | - Lawrence Kohlberg's model: **Pre-conventional** (obedience/punishment-avoidance), **Conventional** (conformity to law and social order), **Post-conventional** (universal ethical principles, e.g. constitutional morality, over blind rule-following) - Useful to demonstrate that a mature administrator's reasoning operates at the post-conventional level, not just rule compliance |
| Conclusion | - Case studies are the **"Moral Laboratory of Governance"** — converting theoretical values into actionable, systemic, and constitutionally anchored governance blueprints |